Wendell Gilliard, who is also running for Senate, says nobody should ever tell a female what she should be doing with her body. While this recent decision is disappointing, it only strengthens my resolve to keep pushing for progress.” We must make sure that reproductive healthcare remains accessible, safe, and private. I strongly believe that everyone should have the right to make decisions about their own bodies without government interference. ”This is about freedom, having control over one’s own body, and ensuring equality for all. As a Senator in the South Carolina Senate, I promise to continue fighting for women’s freedom,” he said. I haven’t changed my stance, and I have never strayed from advocating for women’s reproductive rights or protecting their doctors. “Throughout my career, I have consistently supported protecting women’s reproductive rights. The right to make deeply personal health care decisions should not depend on where you live, and we will not stop fighting for reproductive freedom in South Carolina and across the country.” Under this cruel ban, people across the South will be forced to travel even further just to get the essential healthcare they need. South Carolinians’ rights should not be up for debate. “A change in the court’s makeup shouldn’t change the enduring protections of South Carolina’s constitution. “The South Carolina Supreme Court took an extreme step backwards by letting this six-week ban go into effect, despite striking down a nearly identical ban just seven months ago,” Northup said. The Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the Center for Reproductive Rights, and the law firm Burnette Shutt & McDaniel represented the plaintiffs in the case.Ĭenter for Reproductive Rights President and CEO Nancy Northup said in a statement the court “turned their backs on South Carolinians and their fundamental rights.” That was one of the least restrictive limits in the southeast, and DHEC reported the number of people from other states seeking abortions in the state had skyrocketed since last fall. Planned Parenthood and our partners will keep fighting for our patients’ ability to control their own bodies, lives, and futures - no matter what.”īefore Wednesday’s ruling, abortions had been legal in South Carolina through 20 weeks into a pregnancy. This abortion ban takes away people’s ability to control what happens to their bodies, forcing many South Carolinians to remain pregnant against their will. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic’s doors remain open, and we will continue to provide abortion care in South Carolina under the severe restrictions of this law, but we know that’s not enough. “This abortion ban is nearly identical to the ban struck down by this court just months ago - the only thing that has changed is the makeup of the court,” Black said. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic President and CEO Jenny Black said the decision puts “the dangerous politicization of South Carolina’s highest court on full display,” saying the ruling will cause “irreparable harm” to South Carolinians. The new lawsuit, which asked the state’s Supreme Court to find the new version unconstitutional, prompted a circuit court to place an injunction on the new bill, preventing it from being enforced until the court could rule. Kittredge said the General Assembly claimed it “took into consideration the interests of the pregnant woman and balanced them against the legitimate interest of the state to protect the life of the unborn.” Justice John Cannon Few wrote that he voted to strike down the 2021 act because the General Assembly said it recognized in that version a woman’s interest in making “an informed choice about whether to continue a pregnancy,” yet banned essentially all abortions “without the General Assembly having made any inquiry as to whether a substantial percentage of women even know they are pregnant” in time to make such a choice. “Specifically, the legislature explained it had placed weight on the fact that a woman could learn of her pregnancy within seven to fourteen days of conception and would have several weeks after that to make her decision and have an abortion if she so chose.” “It is apparent the South Carolina General Assembly carefully crafted the 2023 Act in an effort to demonstrate that its policy decision was not arbitrary,” Kittredge wrote.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |